Anarchiel, Vrijheid. Maar dan ook echt! De bibliotheek bevat een verzameling speciale stukken Samengestelde Dossier overzichten van Storts en Artikelen Contact leggen of de Disclaimer lezen RRS overzicht van de Alternatieve Media  
Het Forum voor diverse onderwerpen Onze open Stortplaats, doe mee en plaats zelf iets. Chatten kan bij ons in de Lounge, Vrijheid met een kopje koffie erbij. Enkele Statistieken over het bezoek van deze webstek Onze Links pagina geeft een overzicht van, jawel, LINKS. Onze Muziek pagina bevat enkele eigen werkjes van onze leden.

0  1  2  3 

The Elite, the ‘Great Game’ and World War III


Door Observer1964 om 12:45 op 31-07-2014 in Nieuws
(0x gereageerd, 24x bekeken)

Thursday 31st July 2014 at 06:34 By david-icke



‘The control of the US, and of global politics, by the wealthiest families of the planet
is exercised in a powerful, profound and clandestine manner. This control began in
Europe and has a continuity that can be traced back to the time when the bankers
discovered it was more profitable to give loans to governments than to needy

These banking families and their subservient beneficiaries have come to own most
major businesses over the two centuries during which they have secretly and
increasingly organised themselves as controllers of governments worldwide and as
arbiters of war and peace.

Unless we understand this we will be unable to understand the real reasons for the
two world wars and the impending Third World War, a war that is almost certain to
begin as a consequence of the US attempt to seize and control Central Asia. The
only way out is for the US to back off – something the people of the US and the
world want, but the elite does not.’

The US is a country controlled through the privately owned Federal Reserve, which
in turn is controlled by the handful of banking families that established it by
deception in the first place.

In his interesting book The Secret Team, Col. Fletcher Prouty, briefing officer of the
US President from 1955-63, narrates a remarkable incident in which Winston
Churchill made a most revealing utterance during World War II:

“On this particular night there had been a heavy raid on Rotterdam. He sat there, meditating, and then, as if to himself, he said, ‘Unrestricted submarine warfare, unrestricted air bombing – this is total war.’ He continued sitting there, gazing at a large map, and then said, ‘Time and the Ocean and some guiding star and High Cabal have made us what we are’.”

Prouty further states:

“This was a most memorable scene and a revelation of reality that is infrequent, at best. If for the great Winston Churchill, there is a ‘High Cabal’ that has made us what we are, our definition is complete. Who could know better than Churchill himself during the darkest days of World War II, that there exists, beyond doubt, an international High Cabal? This was true then. It is true today, especially in these times of the One World Order. This all-powerful group has remained superior because it had learned the value of anonymity.” This “High Cabal” is the “One World Cabal” of today, also called the elite by various writers.

The High Cabal and What They Control

The elite owns the media, banks, defence and oil industry. In his book Who’s Who
of the Elite Robert Gaylon Ross Sr. states: “It is my opinion that they own the US
military, NATO, the Secret Service, the CIA, the Supreme Court, and many of the
lower courts. They appear to control, either directly or indirectly, most of the state,
county, and local law enforcement agencies.”

The elite is intent on conquering the world through the use of the abilities of the
people of the United States. It was as far back as 1774 that Amschel Mayer
Rothschild stated at a gathering of the twelve richest men of Prussia in
Frankfurt: “Wars should be directed so that the nations on both sides should be
further in our debt.” He further enunciated at the same meeting: “Panics and
financial depressions would ultimately result in World Government, a new order of
one world government.”

The elite owns numerous “think tanks” that work for expanding, consolidating and
perpetuating its hold on the globe. The Royal Institute of International Affairs
(RIIA), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral
Commission, and many other similar organisations are all funded by the elite and
work for it. These think tanks publish journals, such as Foreign Affairs, in which
these imperialist and anti-mankind ideas are edified as publications, and then, if
need be, expanded in the form of books that are given wide publicity.

Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger et al, as well as the neo-con “thinkers,”
owe their positions and good living standards to the largesse of the elite. This is an
important point that must be kept in full view at all times. These thinkers and
writers are on the payroll of the elite and work for them. In case someone has any
doubts about such a statement, it might help to read the following quotes from
Professor Peter Dale Scott’s comprehensively researched book The Road to 9/11 –
Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America (University of California Press, 2007):

…Bundy’s Harvard protégé Kissinger was named to be national security adviser after having chaired an important “study group” at the Council on Foreign Relations. As a former assistant to Nelson Rockefeller, Kissinger had been paid by Rockefeller to write a book on limited warfare for the CFR. He had also campaigned hard in Rockefeller’s losing campaign for the Presidential nomination in 1968. Thus Rockefeller and the CFR might have been excluded from control of the Republican Party, but not from the Republican White House. (Page 22)

The following quote from page 38 of the book is also very revealing:

The Kissinger-Rockefeller relationship was complex and certainly intense. As investigative reporter Jim Hougan wrote: “Kissinger, married to a former Rockefeller aide, owner of a Georgetown mansion whose purchase was enabled only by Rockefeller gifts and loans, was always a protégé of his patron Nelson Rockefeller, even when he wasn’t directly employed by him.”

Professor Scott adds:

Nixon’s and Kissinger’s arrival in the White House in 1969 coincided with David Rockefeller’s becoming CEO of Chase Manhattan Bank. The Nixon-Kissinger foreign policy of detente was highly congruous with Rockefeller’s push to internationalise
Chase Manhattan banking operations. Thus in 1973 Chase Manhattan became the first American bank to open an office in Moscow. A few months later, thanks to an invitation arranged by Kissinger, Rockefeller became the first US banker to talk with Chinese Communist leaders in Beijing.

How They Manipulate Public Opinion

In addition to these strategic “think tanks” the elite has set up a chain of research
institutes devoted to manipulating public opinion in a manner the elite desires. As
pointed out by John Coleman in his eye opening book The Tavistock Institute on
Human Relations – Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic
Decline of the United States of America, it was in 1913 that an institute was
established at Wellington House, London for manipulation of public opinion.
According to Coleman:

The modern science of mass manipulation was born at Wellington House London, the lusty infant being midwifed by Lord Northcliffe and Lord Rothmere. The British monarchy, Lord Rothschild, and the Rockefellers were responsible for funding the venture… the purpose of those at Wellington House was to effect a change in the opinions of British people who were adamantly opposed to war with Germany, a
formidable task that was accomplished by “opinion making” through polling. The staff consisted of Arnold Toynbee, a future director of studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), Lord Northcliffe, and the Americans, Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays. Lord Northcliffe was related to the Rothschilds
through marriage.

Bernays was a nephew of Sigmund Freud, a fact never mentioned, and developed the technique of “engineering consent.” When Sigmund Freud moved to Britain he also, secretly, became associated with this institute through the Tavistock Institute.
According to Coleman, Bernays “pioneered the use of psychology and other social sciences to shape and form public opinion so that the public thought such manufactured opinions were their own.”

The Tavistock Institute has a 6 billion dollar fund and 400 subsidiary organisations are under its control along with 3,000 think tanks, mostly in the USA. The Stanford Research Institute, the Hoover Institute, the Aspen Institute of Colorado, and many
others, devoted to manipulation of US as well as global public opinion, are Tavistock offshoots. This helps explain why the US public, by and large, is so mesmerised as to be unable to see things clearly and to react.

Bilderberg researcher Daniel Estulin quotes from Mary Scobey’s book To Nurture Humanness a statement attributed to Professor Raymond Houghton, that the CFR has been clear for a very long time that “absolute behaviour control is imminent…
without mankind’s self realisation that a crisis is at hand.”

Also keep in mind that currently 80% of US electronic and print media is owned by only six large corporations. This development has taken place in the past two decades. These corporations are elite owned. It is almost impossible for anyone who is acquainted with what is going on at the global level to watch, even for a few
minutes, the distortions, lies and fabrications, incessantly pouring out of this media, a propaganda and brainwashing organ of the elite.

Once your picture is clear it is also easy to notice the criminal silence of the media on crimes being perpetrated against humanity at the behest of the elite. How many people know that the cancer rates in Fallujah, Iraq are higher than those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of the use of depleted uranium, and maybe other
secret nuclear devices, by US forces? Fallujah was punished for its heroic resistance against the American forces.

The Importance of Eurasia

Why is the US in Central Asia? In order to understand this, one has to look at the
writings of the stooges of the elite – Brzezinski, Kissinger, Samuel P Huntington,
and their likes. It is important to note that members of these elite paid think tanks
publish books as part of a strategy to give respectability to subsequent illegal,
immoral and predatory actions that are to be taken at the behest of the elite. The
views are not necessarily their own – they are the views of the think tanks. These
stooges formulate and pronounce policies and plans at the behest of their masters,
through bodies like the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, etc.

In his infinitely arrogant book The Grand Chessboard, published in 1997, Brzezinski
spelled out the philosophy behind the current US military eruption. He starts by
quoting the well-known views of the British geographer Sir Halford J Mackinder
(1861–1947), another worker for the elite. Mackinder was a member of
the ‘Coefficients Dining Club’ established by members of the Fabian Society in
1902. The continuity of the policies of the elite is indicated by the fact Brzezinski
starts from Mackinder’s thesis first propounded in 1904:

“Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland: Who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island: who commands the World-Island commands the world.”

Brzezinski argues that for the first time in human history a non-Eurasian power has
become preeminent and it must hold sway over the Eurasian continent if it is to
remain the preeminent global power: “For America the chief geopolitical prize is
Eurasia… About 75 percent of the world’s people live in Eurasia… Eurasia accounts
for about 60 percent of the world’s GNP and about three fourths of the world’s
known energy resources.”

It is not just the geostrategic location of this region – it is also its wealth, “both in
its enterprises and beneath its soil,” that holds such attraction for the elite whose
greed for money, and lust for power, remain insatiable, as if there was a sickness
afflicting it.

Brzezinski writes:

“But it is on the globe’s most important playing field – Eurasia – that a potential rival to America might at some point arise. This focusing on the key players and properly assessing the terrain has to be a point of departure for the formulation of American geostrategy for the long-term management of America’s Eurasian
geopolitical interests.”

These lines were published in 1997. Millions of people have died in the past two
decades and millions have been rendered homeless in this region but it remains
a “playing” field for Brzezinski and his likes! In his book Brzezinski has drawn two
very interesting maps – one of these has the caption The Global Zone of Percolating
Violence (page 53) and the other (page 124) is captioned The Eurasian Balkans.
The first of these encircles a region which includes the following countries: Sudan,
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Iran, all Central Asian states, Afghanistan,
Pakistan and parts of Russia as well as India. The second one has two circles, an
inner circle and a wider circle – the outer circle encloses the same countries as in
the first map but the inner circle covers Iran, Afghanistan, eastern Turkey and the
former Soviet Republics in Central Asia.

“This huge region, torn by volatile hatreds and surrounded by competing powerful
neighbours, is likely to be a major battlefield…” writes Brzezinski.

He further writes:

“A possible challenge to American primacy from Islamic fundamentalism could be part of the problem of this unstable region.”

These lines were written at a time when this kind of fundamentalism was not a
problem – subsequently the US manipulated things and chose to make it one by its
provocative and deceptive tactics. According to its strategic thinkers, the US might
face a serious challenge from a coalition of China, Russia and Iran and must do
whatever it can to prevent such a coalition from forming.

For Brzezinski, “terrorism” – a Tavistock-type concept – is just a well planned and
well thought out strategy, a lie and a deception, to provide cover for a military
presence in the Central Eurasian region and elsewhere. It is being used to keep the
US public in a state of fear, to keep Russia in a state of insecurity about further
breakup (the US has trained and supported Chechen fighters, “terrorists,”
throughout) and to justify presence of US troops in and around Central Asia.

The Concocted War on Terrorism

Terrorism provides justification for transforming the United States into a police
state. According to the Washington Post of 20 & 21 December 2010, the US now
has 4,058 anti-terrorism organisations! These are certainly not meant for those so-
called terrorists who operate in Central Asia – the number far exceeds the number
of so-called terrorists in the entire world. Unbridled domestic spying by US agencies
is now a fact of life and the US public, as always, has accepted this because of the
collusion of media and Tavistock type institutes owned by the elite.

The US historian Howard Zinn puts it very well: “The so-called war on terrorism is
not only a war against innocent people in other countries, but also a war on the
people of the United States: a war on our liberties, a war on our standard of living.
The wealth of the country is being stolen from the people and handed over to the
superrich. The lives of our young are being stolen. And the thieves are in the White
House.” Actually the thieves control the White House and have been doing so for a
very long time.

In his outstanding book Crossing the Rubicon, Michael Ruppert points out that
much of the violence in the Central Asian region as well as in Pakistan, which has
been encircled in two maps in Brzezinski’s book, was “initiated by the US
proxies.” “Given that these maps were published a full four years before the first
plane hit the World Trade Centre, they would fall in a category of evidence I
learned about at LAPD [Los Angeles Police Department]. We called them ‘clues’.”
This means that the eruption of US militarism after 9/11, and the event itself, were
part of a pre-planned and coherent strategy of global domination in which the
people of the US were also “conquered” through totalitarian legislation carried out
in the wake of 9/11.

As Brzezinski puts it:

America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a popular democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is
not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being… The economic self-denial (that is, defence spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts.
Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilisation.

Certainly post 9/11 legislation, the extraordinary expansion of agencies and
surveillance of the US public is a cause of great satisfaction for the elite – the US
can hardly be called a democracy now. As reported by the Washington Post, the
National Security Agency intercepts over 1.7 billion emails, phone calls and other
communications every day and stores them. No wonder Bush called 9/11 “a great
opportunity” and Rumsfeld saw it analogous to World War II to “refashion the

In order to achieve the objectives of the elite, the US destroyed Yugoslavia while
Russia stood by mesmerised and impotent, carried out regime changes in Central
Asia, set up military bases in East Europe and Central Asia, and staged highly
provocative military exercises testing Russia’s and China’s will. It set up a military
base in Kyrgyzstan that has a 500 mile or so border with China. When the Chinese
protested recent naval exercises with South Korea were too close to Chinese
territory, a US spokesman responded: “Those determinations are made by us, and
us alone… Where we exercise, when we exercise, with whom and how, with what
assets and so forth are determinations that are made by the United States Navy, by
the Department of Defence, by the United States government.” As journalist Rick
Rozoff notes: “There is no way such confrontational, arrogant and vulgar language
was not understood at its proper value in Beijing.”

The US has acquired bases in Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, and the Czech Republic –
and set up the largest military base ever built in the region, Camp Bondsteel, in
Kosovo. According to a report in the Russian Kommersant newspaper on 3 March
2011, a four-phase plan for deployment of a US missile system in Europe is to be
fully implemented by the end of 2020. The US is also busy setting up bilateral
military ties in Russia’s backyard with Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan,
Turkmenistan and is pursuing the goal of a “Greater Central Asia” from Afghanistan
right up to the Middle East, a great corridor from where the oil, gas, and great
mineral wealth of this region will flow to the coffers of the US elite, at bloody
expense to the local people.

As remarked by the Indian career diplomat M.K. Bhadrakumar: “The time is not far
off before they begin to sense that ‘the war on terror’ is providing a convenient
rubric under which the US is incrementally securing for itself a permanent abode in
the highlands of Hindu Kush, the Pamirs, Central Asian steppes and the Caucasus
that form the strategic hub overlooking Russia, China, India and Iran.” The scene
for a great war involving the great powers of the time – US, Russia and China – is
now set, by design of the elite. It is just a matter of time.

Time and again the US elite has taken its good people into great wars through
documented and proven deceptions – the sinking of the Lusitania during World War
I, Pearl Harbour in World War II, and so on. The elite considers us “human
garbage” – a term first used by the French in Indo-China. It is also generating a
good deal of “human garbage” in the US. A World Bank report points out that in
2005, 28 million Americans were “insecure” – in 2007 the number had risen to 46
million! One in every five Americans is faced with the possibility of
becoming “destitute” – 38 million people receive food coupons!

Michael Ruppert laments:

My country is dead. Its people have surrendered to tyranny and in so doing, they have become tyranny’s primary support group; its base; its defender. Every day they offer their endorsement of tyranny by banking in its banks and spending their borrowed money with the corporations that run it. The great Neocon strategy of
George H.W. Bush has triumphed. Convince the America people that they can’t live without the ‘good things’, then sit back and watch as they endorse the progressively more outrageous crimes you commit as you throw them bones with ever less meat on them. All the while lock them into debt. Destroy the middle class, the only political base that need be feared. Make them accept, because of their shared guilt, ever-more repressive police state measures. Do whatever you want.

A global economic system erected on inhuman and predatory values, where a few
possess more wealth than the billions of hungry put together, will end, but the end
will be painful and bloody. It is a system in which the elite thrives on war and
widespread human misery, on death and destruction by design. As Einstein said, “I
do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they
will use in the Fourth – sticks and stones!”

Prof. Mujahid Kamran is Vice Chancellor, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan,
and his book The Grand Deception – Corporate America and Perpetual War has just
been published (April 2011) by Sang e Meel Publications, Lahore, Pakistan.

Read more: The Elite, the ‘Great Game’ and World War III


Bijbehorende url:

De RSS-feed van de commentaren op dit topic


Geplaatste opmerkingen.



  • Er zijn geen aan dit artikel gerelateerde items gevonden.

    er zijn voor dit item nog geen tags toegevoegd